Italy Mafia Community

I'd recommend to you all and the staff of the server to take care of the non-RP drivers. Please start to punish everyone, who is driving non-RP'ly/ramming non-rp'ly and not RP'ing an accident. It's really annoying to crash into anyone with 200 KM/H and their reaction to be "WOW FEG". The players wasn't a newbie, and level 46 or so. He is not the only one, doing this. The whole community doing it. The server rules should be update with those new rules and players being punished for their generally non-rp actions. I guess an admin jail of 30-60 minutes would be good.

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

I support you.
Licenses shouldnt be removed from dead people, especially firearms license.
Licenses should be removed from people who accept death of their character (making a fresh start with new character).

kiss_of_kill wrote:

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

I support you.
Licenses shouldnt be removed from dead people, especially firearms license.
Licenses should be removed from people who accept death of their character (making a fresh start with new character).

Give this man, a Cookie.

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

The fact is people don't roleplay being dead. And nowadays people intend to get themselves killed in gunfights or arrest scenes so they don't lose their license, that's why PD came up with that.

^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

Aleya wrote:

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

The fact is people don't roleplay being dead. And nowadays people intend to get themselves killed in gunfights or arrest scenes so they don't lose their license, that's why PD came up with that.

I doubt if PD as a whole faction does it since there is no generalized rule for it stated by faction leader, it is an idea that was brought up by a single person, and is seen being enforced by him the most. Honestly, the way people die, at which rate this is just going to ruin it for the people, re-applying with (2x and banned) rule and shit. I do not support removing license each time you find a person dead- unless it's some long going situation and not a random gun battle with gangstas of IM.

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

True, lmao

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

Aleya wrote:

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

He didn't mean that the sniper made by you is better than the one you get from gunstores. He meant that gun licenses will not be so much needed now.

Fabio wrote:

Aleya wrote:

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

He didn't mean that the sniper made by you is better than the one you get from gunstores. He meant that gun licenses will not be so much needed now.

It depends on how available materials are. In other words, it depends if factions will export materials to civilians or not. I also want to tell you that most of weplic possessers are civilians and cops.

Aleya wrote:

Fabio wrote:

Aleya wrote:

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

He didn't mean that the sniper made by you is better than the one you get from gunstores. He meant that gun licenses will not be so much needed now.

It depends on how available materials are. In other words, it depends if factions will export materials to civilians or not. I also want to tell you that most of weplic possessers are civilians and cops.

And civilans can't use sniper either, cops t1/0 get it free, fluffy win

Aleya wrote:

Fabio wrote:

Aleya wrote:

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

He didn't mean that the sniper made by you is better than the one you get from gunstores. He meant that gun licenses will not be so much needed now.

It depends on how available materials are. In other words, it depends if factions will export materials to civilians or not. I also want to tell you that most of weplic possessers are civilians and cops.

We were talking about the sniper. Not other general guns which are really easy to get.

Rafael wrote:

Aleya wrote:

Fabio wrote:

Aleya wrote:

Fluffy wrote:^ You'll see how much license will be needed after sniper is a sellable weapon now.

I prefer to buy a sniper with 10K than spend 2000 materials (x35$ whatsoever) to buy it. Except the fact that 500k is not so much to pay and that the sniper is like a long distance deagle now.

He didn't mean that the sniper made by you is better than the one you get from gunstores. He meant that gun licenses will not be so much needed now.

It depends on how available materials are. In other words, it depends if factions will export materials to civilians or not. I also want to tell you that most of weplic possessers are civilians and cops.

And civilans can't use sniper either, cops t1/0 get it free, fluffy win

I wasn't talking about sniper particularly in my last post though nor was playing a game with Fluffy.

Can you guys chill? This is a thread about the Server Rules, not new updates.

Sly wrote:

Aleya wrote:

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

The fact is people don't roleplay being dead. And nowadays people intend to get themselves killed in gunfights or arrest scenes so they don't lose their license, that's why PD came up with that.

I doubt if PD as a whole faction does it since there is no generalized rule for it stated by faction leader, it is an idea that was brought up by a single person, and is seen being enforced by him the most.

That is not true. I was the one who said it first, and I barely do it. Actually I might've done it once/twice tops.


I rather inspire the fear of making them lose their license to avoid being DM'ed than actually being shot for the shittiest reasons. You clearly (and several) others missed the point. But thank you for making me having to explain it. Now it's uselss no?

Oak wrote:

Sly wrote:

Aleya wrote:

K3lroy wrote:Removing licenses from dead people is retarded. If they're roleplaying dead, they're dead.

The fact is people don't roleplay being dead. And nowadays people intend to get themselves killed in gunfights or arrest scenes so they don't lose their license, that's why PD came up with that.

I doubt if PD as a whole faction does it since there is no generalized rule for it stated by faction leader, it is an idea that was brought up by a single person, and is seen being enforced by him the most.

That is not true. I was the one who said it first, and I barely do it. Actually I might've done it once/twice tops.


I rather inspire the fear of making them lose their license to avoid being DM'ed than actually being shot for the shittiest reasons. You clearly (and several) others missed the point. But thank you for making me having to explain it. Now it's uselss no?

It's the world we live in. Taking a peek at people's response regarding most of the suggestions will give you finest overview in current situations and mindsets of major part. DM is a wide word, thanks to our so liberal ruleset, there are more than several perspectives to look at a situation and class them both the ways.

I suggest making and clarifying an official PayPal disputes rule too since so many people violated it recently.

Aleya wrote:I suggest making and clarifying an official PayPal disputes rule too since so many people violated it recently.

Yes, clarify them not to perform acts of fraud. What kind of an idiot would not know he's not allowed to steal from woot? lol.

Johnny wrote:

Aleya wrote:I suggest making and clarifying an official PayPal disputes rule too since so many people violated it recently.

Yes, clarify them not to perform acts of fraud. What kind of an idiot would not know he's not allowed to steal from woot? lol.

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=34594&hilit=PP+Dispute

Johnny wrote:

Aleya wrote:I suggest making and clarifying an official PayPal disputes rule too since so many people violated it recently.

Yes, clarify them not to perform acts of fraud. What kind of an idiot would not know he's not allowed to steal from woot? lol.

Except the part that they are idiots, more than 20 people got banned for PP disputes.
What kind of an "idiot" would not know he's not allowed to evade an IP ban (before the rule was officially added)?

Aleya wrote:

Johnny wrote:

Aleya wrote:I suggest making and clarifying an official PayPal disputes rule too since so many people violated it recently.

Yes, clarify them not to perform acts of fraud. What kind of an idiot would not know he's not allowed to steal from woot? lol.

Except the part that they are idiots, more than 20 people got banned for PP disputes.
What kind of an "idiot" would not know he's not allowed to evade an IP ban (before the rule was officially added)?

Disputing your money back after receiving product is a crime, violation of terms agreed on, it is probably mentioned in the donations terms which the donor agrees on. It's more of a law other than a server rule, sure.. place it on the server rules, I don't see it changing, that complete idiot who would dispute, would not mind the rules.

Npbb.