Home of the Italy Mafia Roleplay Community
https://forum.sa-mp.im/
This is why ill never understand the reason "We're taking a turf" as a reason to shoot cops.K3lroy wrote:Cops don't see turfs at all. Blinking or taken.
RIP.. XD
but u cant rob at mainbank according to the ruleswoot wrote:I'll just stand at the main bank, shoot everybody that comes close to me - if an admin asks why, I'll just say I thought they will /rob me
It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.woot wrote:I'll just stand at the main bank, shoot everybody that comes close to me - if an admin asks why, I'll just say I thought they will /rob me
yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
haha woot so funnywoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
= less playerswoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
tell me u quit then i do it nowLuigi Tattaglia wrote:= less playerswoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
if thats your goal then thats cool
xaxa
hhhhh much lovewoot wrote:tell me u quit then i do it nowLuigi Tattaglia wrote:= less playerswoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
if thats your goal then thats cool
xaxa
yes all quit please do it and enjoy ur 50 avg pplwoot wrote:tell me u quit then i do it nowLuigi Tattaglia wrote:= less playerswoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
if thats your goal then thats cool
xaxa
sure as if removal of turfs will bring IM's average online people to 50Donaldinho wrote:yes all quit please do it and enjoy ur 50 avg pplwoot wrote:tell me u quit then i do it nowLuigi Tattaglia wrote:= less playerswoot wrote:yes, im trying to reduce the amount of reasons people see to shootFabio wrote: It's not the same thing at all. You are just trying to change a thing which has happened on IM ever since the turfs were introduced.
i think ill just remove turfs instead
less deathmatching
hehe
haha
if thats your goal then thats cool
xaxa
Bossnigguh wrote:Seems like some of you forgot the reason why like 75% of our playerbase actively play's here. They don't login everyday to use /me and RP a car crash or drinking a coffee, they login to hang out with friends and use features that provide rivalries between factions and MAYBE have a little RP fun on top of that. As soon as there is no action going on --> "/f boring, i'm off bye". RP is secondary to majority of our playerbase, especially since all those rules/restrictions that prevent RP scenarios (corruption rule for example) got added. Fact is, there is nothing left to RP on IM that hasn't been RPed 2000 times already.
Basically, if we remove robberies, turfs, runs & wars = dead server in a couple of months. Do you think all those illegal alts join PD to RP? No, they join because being in PD gives them easy, legitimate shootouts. They don't have to drive around for 1 hour and wait for some action to happen, all they do is respond to /em, business/house robbery or type "/p Pull over, NOW" and problem solved.
imo, what we need to do is adjust (and remove) some rules, so everything would fit the script (MG rule for example) and we can continue having both - RP & RPG.
That said, i'm always excited to see more RPG features added since that means more fun and less boredom. xD
Since whenK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
Since logic.francesc0 wrote:Since whenK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
isn't it obvious?francesc0 wrote:Since whenK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
whatK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
Are you fucking serious? XDK3lroy wrote:Since logic.francesc0 wrote:Since whenK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
But ok, it's IM.
When tatt was owning every turf, that's what corl/lynch mob was doing.Donaldinho wrote:whatK3lroy wrote:If you attack someone who's taking an unowned turf, you're obviously DMing.
It's not your turf, thus you have no right to 'defend' it.
You could defend unowned turfs so later your faction could take it. You're also giving the enemy a challenge to take a unowned turf.
If it's like that then what's the point of having a turf when they could just reset it and u cant do anything about it XD
@Bee: what is obvious