Page 2 of 2

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:08 pm
by Johnny
Realizing the majority is being held by the ones who are in favor of the turf, I voted the second option. Massive amount of turfs, that`s exactly what it used to be, which was a fucking war zone all day long.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:11 pm
by Emrys
Voted to bring them back.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:13 pm
by Morris Callahan
Well everyone voted yes so I did too

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:25 pm
by Fabrizio
I would like to see the turfs back, but 50 turfs i think they are too much. Its really fun to take turfs when there is nothing to do, but too many turfs causes wars, a lot of shootouts etc. Thats why i voted "Yes, bring them back, but only a few big ones. (Approx. 10 turfs)".

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:29 pm
by Aleya BANNED
I vouched to bring them back because IM is loved because of its Turfs. Besides, without turfs, factions equal a team/group.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:37 pm
by Altierri
Lol @ "I voted yes because he/she/they voted yes."

Grow a brain and think for yourselves, fucking sheep.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:41 pm
by Spinno
Andrea_Rieu wrote:
Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.

Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:56 pm
by Carrone
Deck wrote:I voted bring them back but only 10 or so of them. I think they should be back because ATM we have all the features of an RP server but the RP itself is RPG. So might as well just have RPGish elements both ways.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 6:56 pm
by Andrëa
Spinno wrote:
Andrea_Rieu wrote:
Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.

Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?
You tell your fellas in the radio that someone is taking your turf and you organise and go there and own them. LEARN TO KNOW THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEN DM AND RP KILLING

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 7:07 pm
by Shadow
Would love to see turfs back again.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 7:17 pm
by Verq
1+ :) I wanna have turfs because its kinda new option to me:)
Since i was noob in LV time and i didn't even know what they meaned.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 7:21 pm
by MishMish
We should have 10 turfs but there should be a limit of turfs a faction can have.
Like, 2 or 3, that way, if a faction wants to have a turf somewhere else, they make a deal for it, replacing their turf with another faction.
And bring back that point thing we had when people were robbing and commiting crimes inside a turf's boundries.

That's what I have on my mind so far.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 8:28 pm
by Blake
freqzon wrote:
Khazor wrote:To many small turfs = too many small shootouts and fights! I vote for 10, if we say we're 5 mobs and each of them controls one or 2 it would be fine!
Bringing turfs back will surely bring more RP between the factions,which is good.. So adding around 10 bigger turfs would be just fine.. If woot were to add approx. 50 turfs it would end up as DM and constant turf take over..
^^ This. - voted for the 10.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 8:31 pm
by francesc0
T-Bag wrote:50 FUCKING TURFS, NOT 10 -.-.1312.3-=1 .FAM OSFJIAOFN ASFJIQ ICFQ .
thiss

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 8:45 pm
by Macedon
T-Bag wrote:50 FUCKING TURFS, NOT 10 -.-.1312.3-=1 .FAM OSFJIAOFN ASFJIQ ICFQ .
Finaly smart thing from you.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 8:52 pm
by Mikey_Hawk
15-20 turfs should be good

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 9:14 pm
by Johnny
Andrea_Rieu wrote:
Spinno wrote:
Andrea_Rieu wrote:
Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.

Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?
You tell your fellas in the radio that someone is taking your turf and you organise and go there and own them. LEARN TO KNOW THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEN DM AND RP KILLING
Lol, turfs are a TDM feature, there is no complicated roleplay behind them, it`s a simple script wise command to create a huge massacre. The fact that it`s valid to kill for it doesn`t mean it`s not creation of deathmatch.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 9:18 pm
by Macedon
Johnny wrote: Lol, turfs are a TDM feature, there is no complicated roleplay behind them, it`s a simple script wise command to create a huge massacre. The fact that it`s valid to kill for it doesn`t mean it`s not creation of deathmatch.
The fact is that people want MORE action and reason to kill someone,no doubt.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 9:22 pm
by Bill Davis
Seems like the mafias dont got much to do so I will vote for bringing turfs back, but to avoid shootouts everywhere all the time I vote for the 10 turfs option.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 10:20 pm
by Court.
I would say yes, Put them in Game because it give faction's/mafia's more to role play with.
The down side to it is there would be a lot more gang wars.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 10:23 pm
by Scar
Macedon wrote:
T-Bag wrote:50 FUCKING TURFS, NOT 10 -.-.1312.3-=1 .FAM OSFJIAOFN ASFJIQ ICFQ .
Finaly smart thing from you.
^ I wasn't there in LV when the turfs were,but since im here now i wanna see them 50 OF THEM! IM gets boring sooner or later,but if 50 turfs were,it would never be boring .

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 10:40 pm
by Peksi
Turfs will double the player reports, But at the end people gets more things to do, Small turfs please.

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 10:59 pm
by Ibtesam_Ali
Yes please! after turfs removed there is no fun i hope this turfs bring fun back


Hey guys

Re: Turfs

Posted: August 15th, 2012, 11:35 pm
by woot
Okay, turfs will return soon, probably only a few all over LS. (9-16).