Re: Important Rules Update
Posted: September 29th, 2012, 5:15 pm
Ehruhgahn wrote:Well done woot.
Home of the Italy Mafia Roleplay Community
https://forum.sa-mp.im/
Ehruhgahn wrote:Well done woot.
Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Morris Callahan wrote:Thats something good to hear.
If you had any idea of how long it takes to look up every single reported player's admin history, to decide when he deserves a temp. suspension, a ban or a permanent ban, I'm pretty sure you'd think otherwise. I've tried doing that but it takes way too long, and reports are already a pain in the ass to deal with.Ehruhgahn wrote:Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Wouldn't we all, I think if they still continue to rule break after being jailed a few times it should be a Temp Ban, If they continue after that a IP Ban.
I wouldn't expect you to go back and read all bans and stuff on the account you get what 10-11 Records on the UCP just check them? but yeah reports already seem like a bother ^.^MacKenzie wrote:If you had any idea of how long it takes to look up every single reported player's admin history, to decide when he deserves a temp. suspension, a ban or a permanent ban, I'm pretty sure you'd think otherwise. I've tried doing that but it takes way too long, and reports are already a pain in the ass to deal with.Ehruhgahn wrote:Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Wouldn't we all, I think if they still continue to rule break after being jailed a few times it should be a Temp Ban, If they continue after that a IP Ban.
Makke wrote:[ AJAIL ] Jake_Hawk[57] has been adminjailed by Makke_Benton for 120 minutes. Reason: DMing inside the PD [Forum report]
Killing inside the PD without a valid reason;usama_ilyas wrote:Why are admins still jailing for 120mins for deathmathing? 0.0Makke wrote:[ AJAIL ] Jake_Hawk[57] has been adminjailed by Makke_Benton for 120 minutes. Reason: DMing inside the PD [Forum report]
lolsantones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
hmm.. /me facepalmsThe Great Old wrote:lolsantones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think he was trolling but none of you lot get it.The Great Old wrote:santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think you don't really know the right meaning of DM.
I suggest you to read the server rules clearly.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16
I wouldn't be sure of that with the current players on IM...Fabio wrote:I think he was trolling but none of you lot get it.The Great Old wrote:santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think you don't really know the right meaning of DM.
I suggest you to read the server rules clearly.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16