Page 14 of 15
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 2:58 pm
by Donny
woot PLS DONT ADD SAVE WEAPONS.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:19 pm
by _n1k0_
Car surf was removed for a reason, so that we wouldn't see 10 people standing ontop of a single sultan driving down the street with M4's in their hands, hell I even remember 10 people in /lay on an NRG driving around. And so that we wouldn't see airplanes flying around with 7 people in /fall taking turfs.
Removing the car surfing, fixed the problems and issues we were having in that regards, now that the problem is fixed, you wish to undo that fix, does that make any sense?
I vote against that, in fact I didn't really like any of the "most voted options" in this survey, the simple RP quiz and the adjustable player items were the only good ones in my opinion.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:23 pm
by T-Rock
Vlad wrote:Car surf was removed for a reason, so that we wouldn't see 10 people standing ontop of a single sultan driving down the street with M4's in their hands, hell I even remember 10 people in /lay on an NRG driving around. And so that we wouldn't see airplanes flying around with 7 people in /fall taking turfs.
Removing the car surfing, fixed the problems and issues we were having in that regards, now that the problem is fixed, you wish to undo that fix, does that make any sense?
I vote against that, in fact I didn't really like any of the "most voted options" in this survey, the simple RP quiz and the adjustable player items were the only good ones in my opinion.
One of the replies I liked the most. Absolutely agreed.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:26 pm
by Rick
Vlad wrote:Car surf was removed for a reason, so that we wouldn't see 10 people standing ontop of a single sultan driving down the street with M4's in their hands, hell I even remember 10 people in /lay on an NRG driving around. And so that we wouldn't see airplanes flying around with 7 people in /fall taking turfs.
Removing the car surfing, fixed the problems and issues we were having in that regards, now that the problem is fixed, you wish to undo that fix, does that make any sense?
I vote against that, in fact I didn't really like any of the "most voted options" in this survey, the simple RP quiz and the adjustable player items were the only good ones in my opinion.
get out pls
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:48 pm
by Donald
turfing from a plane... best
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:49 pm
by sexpistol
Vlad wrote:Car surf was removed for a reason, so that we wouldn't see 10 people standing ontop of a single sultan driving down the street with M4's in their hands, hell I even remember 10 people in /lay on an NRG driving around. And so that we wouldn't see airplanes flying around with 7 people in /fall taking turfs.
Removing the car surfing, fixed the problems and issues we were having in that regards, now that the problem is fixed, you wish to undo that fix, does that make any sense?
I vote against that, in fact I didn't really like any of the "most voted options" in this survey, the simple RP quiz and the adjustable player items were the only good ones in my opinion.
Didn't think you'd think that about the surfing and the quiz :o Wise words
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 3:49 pm
by Noam
I want BMX
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 4:22 pm
by Chucky
woot wrote:Leonz wrote:When are part II conclusions coming?
Soon™
Your "soon" is always too far...
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 4:24 pm
by Sly
No car surf thanks
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 4:25 pm
by Stav Cuneo
Vlad wrote:Car surf was removed for a reason, so that we wouldn't see 10 people standing ontop of a single sultan driving down the street with M4's in their hands, hell I even remember 10 people in /lay on an NRG driving around. And so that we wouldn't see airplanes flying around with 7 people in /fall taking turfs.
Removing the car surfing, fixed the problems and issues we were having in that regards, now that the problem is fixed, you wish to undo that fix, does that make any sense?
I vote against that, in fact I didn't really like any of the "most voted options" in this survey, the simple RP quiz and the adjustable player items were the only good ones in my opinion.
Reasonable ; )
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 5:27 pm
by Aldo
car surf pls.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:24 am
by dove
PLZ FIX WARP
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:43 am
by P4kit0
- Warp fix
- Special undercover admin team with good hacking knowledge to /sp and record evidences.
I think those 2 issues are more urgent than any of the ones that are present in the survey conclusions.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:48 am
by Bossnigguh
Cheaters donate too. xD Imagine a good anti-cheat system on IM, we would probably see like 40 players banned in a week or two.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:48 am
by Aldo
Bossnigguh wrote:Cheaters donate too. xD
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:54 am
by P4kit0
There's no need to ban the players. A good anti-cheat script can just avoid the using of hacks. Like "I know you have no spread! Uninstall it! **kicked the player**" ahahahha
Anyways I was talking about admin team and not a script. If they get evidences of a heavy donator, woot may handle it as he wants.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 10:57 am
by Bossnigguh
I know, but why the anti-cheat isnt here yet?
Many other servers are using a good anti-cheat nowadays, but not us. Why?
I could name probably 4-5 players that know their ways around cheaters and would probably clean this server from cheaters, but none of them wishes to deal with all the other admin stuff. xD
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:09 am
by Weed
P4kit0 wrote:- Warp fix
- Special undercover admin team with good hacking knowledge to /sp and record evidences.
I think those 2 issues are more urgent than any of the ones that are present in the survey conclusions.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:11 am
by P4kit0
I truly don't know why an anti-cheat isn't implemented yet. Lazyness of woot? Because it doesn't even have to ban the people, it just restricts them using of cheats on IM. If woot doesn't want to ban the donator hackers, make the script use /kick instead of /ban.
According to my understanding, hacks like HH, nospread, rapidfire, etc. are easy catchable with the Bullet/Damage log (and spread log too) right? Why don't we even have a damage log yet? Not only it would open doors to a good anti-cheat script, but it would also be useful for admins in reports.
Ye' that's why I agree in creating an admin-team which doesn't have to handle with any of the other shits, and their purposes would just be record enough evidences to punish a hacker.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:19 am
by Bossnigguh
Yes, everything you said is on point.
Good anti cheat and atleast 2 cheater hunters would be perfect.
And please fix the warp issue already.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:29 am
by jek
There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:30 am
by Aldo
i dont know where they get that link for aimbot lol.
in 0.3z i dont think works but...
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:32 am
by jek
Aldo Scagliotto wrote:i dont know where they get that link for aimbot lol.
in 0.3z i dont think works but...
It does, there's several aimbots which cannot be detected. There's aimbots that avoids 180 spins aswell, including sniper aimbots.
Too many different type of aimbots as I said, what admins needs to do is some research, it's not difficult.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:32 am
by Donny
jeKson wrote:There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 11:34 am
by Aldo
jeKson wrote:Aldo Scagliotto wrote:i dont know where they get that link for aimbot lol.
in 0.3z i dont think works but...
It does, there's several aimbots which cannot be detected. There's aimbots that avoids 180's aswell, including sniper aimbots.
i've heard about this.
Nino said that on TS.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 12:40 pm
by Donald
jeKson wrote:There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.
I can name at least 10.
I agree about a special admin team which its purpose is only catching hackers.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 1:48 pm
by Rick
Lol one out of four is aimbotting
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 1:55 pm
by jek
Smoke wrote:jeKson wrote:There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.
I can name at least 10.
I agree about a special admin team which its purpose is only catching hackers.
And Makke would lead them with a few other admins with knowledge regarding this.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 2:00 pm
by leonzio
jeKson wrote:Smoke wrote:jeKson wrote:There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.
I can name at least 10.
I agree about a special admin team which its purpose is only catching hackers.
And Makke would lead them with a few other admins with knowledge regarding this.
this ldr ok
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 23rd, 2014, 2:13 pm
by dove
jeKson wrote:There's tons of aimbotters playing actively, i'm sure I can name atleast five.