Page 4 of 8

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:25 pm
by Ehruhgahn
Ray wrote:Would love to see the server in SF :P
God no!

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:27 pm
by Eugine
SOB to FBI.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:27 pm
by Donny
Why Perry when Tots is your best solution
SF eh? Hmm

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:28 pm
by leonzio
Eugine wrote:SOB to FBI.
Hell no.

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽ PERRY ADMIN OR RIOT ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:29 pm
by Eugine
Ok perry for admin then he'll make FBI, or immediate demote.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:30 pm
by ray
Ehruhgahn wrote:
Ray wrote:Would love to see the server in SF :P
God no!
Why not ?

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:44 pm
by Ehruhgahn
Ray wrote:
Ehruhgahn wrote:
Ray wrote:Would love to see the server in SF :P
God no!
Why not ?
Dislike it so much, Not to mention there isn't that much really there. Tried playing SP again few months ago hit SF and just died lol cbf playing the game ROFL.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:46 pm
by jek
LV is fucking nice.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:47 pm
by dskhvci13
jeKson wrote:LV is fucking nice.
MOVE TO LAS QUADAbaDOS

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:47 pm
by Donny
dskhvci13 wrote:
jeKson wrote:LV is fucking nice.
MOVE TO LAS QUADAbaDOS
Fort Carson xD

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:56 pm
by Luigi Tattaglia
Moving back to LV won't ever happen. woot made that clear on several occasions. You have to keep some things in perspective here and be real about some things. LV is mapped out with half the city ruined. Moving to LV will result in a 'business and houses' catastrophe; it did so before and it would do so again, but on a much larger scale.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:57 pm
by Bossnigguh
LS doubled our playerbase, going back to LV makes no sense at this point.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:58 pm
by Vic
Appreciated the opportunity. Looking forward to changes!!

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 12:59 pm
by Luigi Tattaglia
Bossnigguh wrote:LS doubled our playerbase, going back to LV makes no sense at this point.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:04 pm
by Snoozy
woot4remove XD

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:08 pm
by Luigi Tattaglia
I hope that the number of surveys isn't relevant to woot seeing as it can be filed in more than once.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:10 pm
by Vic
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:I hope that the number of surveys isn't relevant to woot seeing as it can be filed in more than once.
Yeah, I really hope all the people here filling in with respect, and not just because to see someone go away or getting their suggestion through. ONE survey is enough for each individual.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:10 pm
by francesc0
IM RPG .

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:17 pm
by Gustave
Ekra_Ultimate wrote:IM RPG .
Cometh the day, I will seriously consider leaving IM

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:19 pm
by Luigi Tattaglia
Gustave wrote:
Ekra_Ultimate wrote:IM RPG .
Cometh the day, I will seriously consider leaving IM
It always is a RPG server actually and woot even stated his intent on leaving the scale tilted in favour of RPG mechanics. He said he'd have no problem renaming it to RPG either because there is no factual difference.
woot wrote:You can't compare IM with LSRP.

I'm not trying to enforce strict roleplaying, I want this server to be fun and roleplay isn't fun (at least for me). If I wanna roleplay I shutdown my PC and go outside, there's enough to roleplay.

The server is supposed to be fun (which it is for the majority of people) and not even close to the roleplaying standards of other RP servers. That was not the intention ever since I own the server. I deny any suggestion that would have a big impact on how the roleplay standards would increase on IM.

If you're looking for real life then go outside (or on another server)

I wouldn't mind changing the server name back to Italy Mafia RPG :)

This kind of thinking from his side is what is keeping IM alive. If he'd change his view, IM would get ruined just like it got ruined in the past with all those enforce-more-roleplay experiments(which were actually just an enforce-annoyment&ruin-fun experiments).

The sooner all players and admins accept what he wrote, the more progress will be made in terms of the fun and playercount.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:26 pm
by Ehruhgahn
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:
Gustave wrote:
Ekra_Ultimate wrote:IM RPG .
Cometh the day, I will seriously consider leaving IM
It always is a RPG server actually and woot even stated his intent on leaving the scale tilted in favour of RPG mechanics. He said he'd have no problem renaming it to RPG either because there is no factual difference.
woot wrote:You can't compare IM with LSRP.

I'm not trying to enforce strict roleplaying, I want this server to be fun and roleplay isn't fun (at least for me). If I wanna roleplay I shutdown my PC and go outside, there's enough to roleplay.

The server is supposed to be fun (which it is for the majority of people) and not even close to the roleplaying standards of other RP servers. That was not the intention ever since I own the server. I deny any suggestion that would have a big impact on how the roleplay standards would increase on IM.

If you're looking for real life then go outside (or on another server)

I wouldn't mind changing the server name back to Italy Mafia RPG :)

This kind of thinking from his side is what is keeping IM alive. If he'd change his view, IM would get ruined just like it got ruined in the past with all those enforce-more-roleplay experiments(which were actually just an enforce-annoyment&ruin-fun experiments).

The sooner all players and admins accept what he wrote, the more progress will be made in terms of the fun and playercount.
Hear Hear!

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:27 pm
by dskhvci13
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:
Gustave wrote:
Ekra_Ultimate wrote:IM RPG .
Cometh the day, I will seriously consider leaving IM
It always is a RPG server actually and woot even stated his intent on leaving the scale tilted in favour of RPG mechanics. He said he'd have no problem renaming it to RPG either because there is no factual difference.
woot wrote:You can't compare IM with LSRP.

I'm not trying to enforce strict roleplaying, I want this server to be fun and roleplay isn't fun (at least for me). If I wanna roleplay I shutdown my PC and go outside, there's enough to roleplay.

The server is supposed to be fun (which it is for the majority of people) and not even close to the roleplaying standards of other RP servers. That was not the intention ever since I own the server. I deny any suggestion that would have a big impact on how the roleplay standards would increase on IM.

If you're looking for real life then go outside (or on another server)

I wouldn't mind changing the server name back to Italy Mafia RPG :)

This kind of thinking from his side is what is keeping IM alive. If he'd change his view, IM would get ruined just like it got ruined in the past with all those enforce-more-roleplay experiments(which were actually just an enforce-annoyment&ruin-fun experiments).

The sooner all players and admins accept what he wrote, the more progress will be made in terms of the fun and playercount.
Currently the server is not fun at all.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:27 pm
by Luigi Tattaglia
The problem obviously lies within your demands then.

Whoever wants strict roleplay always has a quiet place on IM to do their thing. Problems start occuring when this select, text-loving ultraminority of players attempts to enforce their vision of the server onto the rest.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:29 pm
by Peterson
I will fill it soon.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:33 pm
by dskhvci13
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:The problem obviously lies within your demands then.

Whoever wants strict roleplay always has a quiet place on IM to do their thing. Problems start occuring when this select, text-loving ultraminority of players attempts to enforce their vision of the server onto the rest.
I thinks text-rp is extremley boring, RP isn't about the text, is about having fun in character.
Take tattaglia for example, they don't do shit IC that should make me scare from them, but when they coming at me and i don't show fear, i will get reported for non-fear from "great gang"

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:38 pm
by jek
dskhvci13 wrote:
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:The problem obviously lies within your demands then.

Whoever wants strict roleplay always has a quiet place on IM to do their thing. Problems start occuring when this select, text-loving ultraminority of players attempts to enforce their vision of the server onto the rest.
I thinks text-rp is extremley boring, RP isn't about the text, is about having fun in character.
Take tattaglia for example, they don't do shit IC that should make me scare from them, but when they coming at me and i don't show fear, i will get reported for non-fear from "great gang"
What you said doesn't make much sense.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:48 pm
by Aesthetic Guy
Can't really see a diffrence between the current game mode and RPG. It is already very close to RPG.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:51 pm
by SmokeyMLT
i dont know but i would rrly start rping the small thinks that nobody give a shit about them. like when you are at HQ you start shooting the polls and shit. some ppl take it OOC, i would like to start taking some small shit stuff as IC and make the RP more sexy and better

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 1:54 pm
by Fabio
Ray wrote:
Wee Man wrote:We need admins from different timezones, most are always IA at certain times because 8/10 of them are from countries around Norway etc... I feel there should be admins from different time zones.
If you do that, they still won't log in because there won't be any players online to have fun with.
Gustave wrote:
Buck wrote:I'm honestly looking forward to the opening of either a new legal faction or the re-opening of the Government. It'd be amazing if the Government would reopen as we'd actually finally have a numerous amount of people who are in charge of the city instead of the SASF.
I wouldn't mind this actually. But it's not as easy as you suggest. It requires alot of dedication from the leader, something that most of them lacked
You think the Government would be in charge of the city? Tell that to Ozzy. I couldn't do anything major without asking him first, which is good because I was only a mayor.


As much as I would love to play in LV again, there's no point going back now. It would be way too much hassle for the management when they'd have to move houses and bizes because they have to choose spots that match the spots they had in LS, which is kinda hard because LV is a lot smaller than LS.


Perry would be the best at catching hackers in my opinion. He knows so much shit about cleo.

Re: IM:RP Survey

Posted: May 14th, 2014, 2:36 pm
by Chucky
dskhvci13 wrote:
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:The problem obviously lies within your demands then.

Whoever wants strict roleplay always has a quiet place on IM to do their thing. Problems start occuring when this select, text-loving ultraminority of players attempts to enforce their vision of the server onto the rest.
I thinks text-rp is extremley boring, RP isn't about the text, is about having fun in character.
Take tattaglia for example, they don't do shit IC that should make me scare from them, but when they coming at me and i don't show fear, i will get reported for non-fear from "great gang"
???