Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:40 pm
Increased business slots. Save weapons. Car surfing. Relly..
Italy Mafia Community
Home of the Italy Mafia Roleplay Community
https://forum.sa-mp.im/
Survey conclusions
Page 4 of 15
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:40 pm
By the way, only level 15+ & unbanned accounts should be able to vote. Both for 1st and 2nd part.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:42 pm
Increased house & business slots and car surfing.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:43 pm
tbf the ones I didn't vote for will ruin the server from my perspective.
RP quiz = rip playerbase
save weapons = rip money & playerbase because guns are so expensive.
PD 3 F-auths I don't really care, but they already have more T1's so I don't see why they need it.
Bring FBI back - I'm assuming FBI will be given to SOB but unfortunately SOB has quite some noobs in it which are not capable enough to be a member of the FBI, leading to MGing cases and people moaning all over. Much like how the previous FBI ended up.
In my eyes, the ones I selected will only bring more ''fun'' to the server rather than destroy it.
RP quiz = rip playerbase
save weapons = rip money & playerbase because guns are so expensive.
PD 3 F-auths I don't really care, but they already have more T1's so I don't see why they need it.
Bring FBI back - I'm assuming FBI will be given to SOB but unfortunately SOB has quite some noobs in it which are not capable enough to be a member of the FBI, leading to MGing cases and people moaning all over. Much like how the previous FBI ended up.
In my eyes, the ones I selected will only bring more ''fun'' to the server rather than destroy it.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:44 pm
i dont even know why i agreeCarrone wrote:tbf the ones I didn't vote for will ruin the server from my perspective.
RP quiz = rip playerbase
save weapons = rip money & playerbase because guns are so expensive.
PD 3 F-auths I don't really care, but they already have more T1's so I don't see why they need it.
Bring FBI back - I'm assuming FBI will be given to SOB but unfortunately SOB has quite some noobs in it which are not capable enough to be a member of the FBI, leading to MGing cases and people moaning all over. Much like how the previous FBI ended up.
In my eyes, the ones I selected will only bring more ''fun'' to the server rather than destroy it.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:44 pm
Looking forward to the updates that's gonna be made. I hope car surfing is back.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:48 pm
Unfortunately the admin I suggested to remove isn't removed yet, but well, things can chance.
@Gustave
You've 2 votes because of your awesome signature, not because you're a good admin, noob
@Gustave
You've 2 votes because of your awesome signature, not because you're a good admin, noob
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 8:55 pm
I got two votes, because people hated my sig. Thanks Obamaresini wrote:Unfortunately the admin I suggested to remove isn't removed yet, but well, things can chance.
@Gustave
You've 2 votes because of your awesome signature, not because you're a good admin, noob
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:01 pm
Adding car surfing again would be retarded, people that voted for that should consider joining a dm server instead.
As for permanent guns, how can we make a decision towards that when we don't even know the deeper details of it? As in, what would the prices actually be? What about faction gunstocks? Would there be any changes to that? And what would happen to the burrito runs? Surely they would have to be changed in some way to fit in with the new system. And what about the current material system? Would there be any changes to that, as in how many materials would be required to create a weapon, would it be different as for gathering materials than how it is now, would there be a material reset just like the recent drug reset? And what about the war system? It's already extremely expensive, with such a new gun system, it would not fit in or synchronize with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required. And these are just some of the things I'm referring to.
As for permanent guns, how can we make a decision towards that when we don't even know the deeper details of it? As in, what would the prices actually be? What about faction gunstocks? Would there be any changes to that? And what would happen to the burrito runs? Surely they would have to be changed in some way to fit in with the new system. And what about the current material system? Would there be any changes to that, as in how many materials would be required to create a weapon, would it be different as for gathering materials than how it is now, would there be a material reset just like the recent drug reset? And what about the war system? It's already extremely expensive, with such a new gun system, it would not fit in or synchronize with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required. And these are just some of the things I'm referring to.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:02 pm
Here we go again. The current war system is the best system with any gun pricing whatsoever.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:03 pm
Luigi Tattaglia wrote:Here we go again.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:04 pm
Speak by yourself. I find it perfect. Wars are supposed to have a significant impact on the looser participant.Vlad wrote:It's already extremely expensive,
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:05 pm
Its not expensive. During the last war Tattaglia earned around $700M in cash via bank balance.Vlad wrote:And what about the war system? It's already extremely expensive, with such a new gun system, it would not fit in or synchronize with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required. And these are just some of the things I'm referring to.
I know you've lost $1.5B during the last war(cash only); that however doesn't mean you ought to ruin the best war system we've had in years. I'm certain you suggested a change and it didn't go through; no need to try pushing your idea through a pipe just to have it heard of.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:06 pm
That's bold of you to say when we have no idea how things would be like with the new gun system, thus the reason of my comment above, but keep talking trash then if that makes you feel better.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:Here we go again. The current war system is the best system with any gun pricing whatsoever.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Edit: Ah, looks like i stepped right into a kindergarten class.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:08 pm
I am against any gun saving and I have a pretty much clear idea what it would cause.Vlad wrote:That's bold of you to say when we have no idea how things would be like with the new gun system, thus the reason of my comment above, but keep talking trash then if that makes you feel better.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:Here we go again. The current war system is the best system with any gun pricing whatsoever.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Talking trash? For the sake of the thread, I'll move you to my recycle bin.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:13 pm
For the sake of not loosing more braincells I'll move you to my ignore list. Want to continue going offtopic and flame me for no reason at all? Well enjoy doing it alone as i wont be able to read your comments any longer, enjoy.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:I am against any gun saving and I have a pretty much clear idea what it would cause.Vlad wrote:That's bold of you to say when we have no idea how things would be like with the new gun system, thus the reason of my comment above, but keep talking trash then if that makes you feel better.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:Here we go again. The current war system is the best system with any gun pricing whatsoever.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Talking trash? For the sake of the thread, I'll move you to my recycle bin.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:15 pm
what ''enjoy'' did i allow you to say that? no I didn't, bye and enjoy.Vlad wrote:For the sake of not loosing more braincells I'll move you to my ignore list. Want to continue going offtopic and flame me for no reason at all? Well enjoy doing it alone as i wont be able to read your comments any longer, enjoy.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:I am against any gun saving and I have a pretty much clear idea what it would cause.Vlad wrote:That's bold of you to say when we have no idea how things would be like with the new gun system, thus the reason of my comment above, but keep talking trash then if that makes you feel better.Luigi Tattaglia wrote:Here we go again. The current war system is the best system with any gun pricing whatsoever.Vlad wrote:it would not fit in with the current war system, perhaps an entire new war system would be required.
Talking trash? For the sake of the thread, I'll move you to my recycle bin.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:17 pm
Well for me no admins should be remove from the staff....... They're all doing there best to make community a better place. And I can bet most of those votes are players who got banned/Friend got banned....... Thomas seems your the second most hated admin and your all ways working *sigh* (see you in rust). I Hope the decisions that were made makes the community much better than how it is right now......
Just submitted part 2 of the survey..... Good luck
Just submitted part 2 of the survey..... Good luck
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:18 pm
I just hope people wont vote for the gun saving. It would be the worst feature ever on IM
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:19 pm
Mario Tintoretto wrote:I just hope people wont vote for the gun saving. It would be the worst feature ever on IM
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:20 pm
Mario Tintoretto wrote:I just hope people wont vote for the gun saving. It would be the worst feature ever on IM
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:21 pm
Bring fbi back!!
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:21 pm
Don't forget that the voters also had to write the reason if they voted against an admin, just saying. It's a pity for Misha though :/Eddie wrote:Removal of Mikhail over a poll doesn't make sense. That's just sad if you ask me.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:22 pm
I'm wondering who vote for Mikhails removal
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:23 pm
paternos 
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:31 pm
Hate can be good, sometimes.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:37 pm
take into account that all banned people can vote too. That's the reason Thomas got so many votes xD
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:38 pm
easy.
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:39 pm
fuck i didnt know u could vote for more than 1 at each section fucking shit
anw i voted carsurf + that biz shit
the gun system can fuck off
fbi can fuck off
pd authority can fuck off
i wish i voted to remove ems
rp quiz can fuck off
forum shoutbox idc
increased house biz slot i wish i fucking vote this
anw i voted carsurf + that biz shit
the gun system can fuck off
fbi can fuck off
pd authority can fuck off
i wish i voted to remove ems
rp quiz can fuck off
forum shoutbox idc
increased house biz slot i wish i fucking vote this
Re: Survey conclusions
Posted: May 16th, 2014, 9:42 pm
Get FBI back.