It's only a counter-measure to reduce abuse.Calogero wrote:So /close is allowed during wars ?woot wrote: Anti-rulebreaking:
- /close cannot be used if you were shot within the last 5 minutes
[fsize=x-large]W9) Other war rules / clarifications:[/fsize]
- Closing yourself or rivals in a building is not permitted. (e.g. /close @ house/biz)
The prize would be split between the victorious team.any problem wrote:Example:
Situation: [Team 1] Tattaglia vs. [Team 2] Stracci & Kemirov with a prize of $300m
Stracci & Kemirov both receive $300m into their faction bank.
where does the extra 300m come from
which is why you have to be careful who you invite to play in the war besides youTuCo wrote:Not really, you might die/rage and use it so what's the point? Some people rage in wars alot and they might use it instead of calming down - /q'ing like angry momentsCypress wrote:Better than having people who refuse to un-invite youTuCo wrote:This /leavefaction cmd is so bad
those type of people have no business participating in a war thenTuCo wrote:Not really, you might die/rage and use it so what's the point? Some people rage in wars alot and they might use it instead of calming down - /q'ing like angry momentsCypress wrote:Better than having people who refuse to un-invite youTuCo wrote:This /leavefaction cmd is so bad
We all know how most of people act in wars, most of them RAGE in normal gun fights, so what do you expect from them in war?Cypress wrote:which is why you have to be careful who you invite to play in the war besides youTuCo wrote:Not really, you might die/rage and use it so what's the point? Some people rage in wars alot and they might use it instead of calming down - /q'ing like angry momentsCypress wrote:Better than having people who refuse to un-invite youTuCo wrote:This /leavefaction cmd is so bad
To raise their moralMiMiMi wrote:Why did Kemirov win in example
I agree with everything but this, I believe the 20% is simply too little and it should be increased to something such as 40/45 of the active war members.woot wrote:
A faction may not lose more than 20% of it's members during the war or it will be automatically disqualified.
TuCo wrote:This /leavefaction cmd is so bad
25 max lol what 40/45 xDCypress wrote:I agree with everything but this, I believe the 20% is simply too little and it should be increased to something such as 40/45 of the active war members.woot wrote:
A faction may not lose more than 20% of it's members during the war or it will be automatically disqualified.
Calogero wrote:Why don't all participating factions pay the war fee of 300M ? Wouldn't it be more fair and attractive for the faction that's warring alone ? The way it is described above encourages 1 vs multiple factions since it doesn't really have conswoot wrote: Example: [Team 1] Tattaglia vs. [Team 2] Stracci & Kemirov with a prize of $300m
When the war starts, Tattaglia will automatically get $300m deducted from their faction bank, Stracci and Kemirov will get $150m deducted from their faction bank. This puts the prize of the war to $600m.
[21:05:57] <~King_Hual> i haven't touched imrp since june 2016ThaCrypte wrote:I bet King_Hual scripted this.
Not u
so.
yea....
Calogero wrote:Calogero wrote:Why don't all participating factions pay the war fee of 300M ? Wouldn't it be more fair and attractive for the faction that's warring alone ? The way it is described above encourages 1 vs multiple factions since it doesn't really have conswoot wrote: Example: [Team 1] Tattaglia vs. [Team 2] Stracci & Kemirov with a prize of $300m
When the war starts, Tattaglia will automatically get $300m deducted from their faction bank, Stracci and Kemirov will get $150m deducted from their faction bank. This puts the prize of the war to $600m.
He got paid extra to say that.Copani wrote:[21:05:57] <~King_Hual> i haven't touched imrp since june 2016ThaCrypte wrote:I bet King_Hual scripted this.
Not u
so.
yea....
20% is a good chunk of any faction.Cypress wrote:I agree with everything but this, I believe the 20% is simply too little and it should be increased to something such as 40/45 of the active war members.woot wrote:
A faction may not lose more than 20% of it's members during the war or it will be automatically disqualified.
War RulesCypress wrote: Is there no minimum activity required per day/week?
A 2 vs 1 isn't meant to be fair.Calogero wrote:Why don't all participating factions pay the war fee of 300M ? Wouldn't it be more fair and attractive for the faction that's warring alone ? The way it is described above encourages 1 vs multiple factions since it doesn't really have conswoot wrote: Example: [Team 1] Tattaglia vs. [Team 2] Stracci & Kemirov with a prize of $300m
When the war starts, Tattaglia will automatically get $300m deducted from their faction bank, Stracci and Kemirov will get $150m deducted from their faction bank. This puts the prize of the war to $600m.