Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?Andrea_Rieu wrote:woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.
Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
Deck wrote:I voted bring them back but only 10 or so of them. I think they should be back because ATM we have all the features of an RP server but the RP itself is RPG. So might as well just have RPGish elements both ways.
You tell your fellas in the radio that someone is taking your turf and you organise and go there and own them. LEARN TO KNOW THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEN DM AND RP KILLINGSpinno wrote:Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?Andrea_Rieu wrote:woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.
Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
^^ This. - voted for the 10.freqzon wrote:Bringing turfs back will surely bring more RP between the factions,which is good.. So adding around 10 bigger turfs would be just fine.. If woot were to add approx. 50 turfs it would end up as DM and constant turf take over..Khazor wrote:To many small turfs = too many small shootouts and fights! I vote for 10, if we say we're 5 mobs and each of them controls one or 2 it would be fine!
Lol, turfs are a TDM feature, there is no complicated roleplay behind them, it`s a simple script wise command to create a huge massacre. The fact that it`s valid to kill for it doesn`t mean it`s not creation of deathmatch.Andrea_Rieu wrote:You tell your fellas in the radio that someone is taking your turf and you organise and go there and own them. LEARN TO KNOW THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEN DM AND RP KILLINGSpinno wrote:Calm your nipples, I only stated the reasons since I like to give a reason why do I feel the X way. And yes, we are aware what deathmatching is, but do you really call killing enemy color after seeing "Someone is taking your turf, hurry!" in the chat, an RP scenario?Andrea_Rieu wrote:woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.Spinno wrote:No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.
Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!
The fact is that people want MORE action and reason to kill someone,no doubt.Johnny wrote: Lol, turfs are a TDM feature, there is no complicated roleplay behind them, it`s a simple script wise command to create a huge massacre. The fact that it`s valid to kill for it doesn`t mean it`s not creation of deathmatch.
^ I wasn't there in LV when the turfs were,but since im here now i wanna see them 50 OF THEM! IM gets boring sooner or later,but if 50 turfs were,it would never be boring .Macedon wrote:Finaly smart thing from you.T-Bag wrote:50 FUCKING TURFS, NOT 10 -.-.1312.3-=1 .FAM OSFJIAOFN ASFJIQ ICFQ .