Turfs

[woot]

Just a global poll to know if you guys would like the turfs back. Please do not insult/rage whether it causes deathmatch or whatever. Simply pick an option and reply in thread with your opinion with up- and downsides of it.

[Ghost_old]

Voted not to bring them back, they would sometimes create some specific fun for the illegal side by the short term, but in the long term they will generally cause a chaos to the server's order in my opinion.

[Khazor]

To many small turfs = too many small shootouts and fights! I vote for 10, if we say we're 5 mobs and each of them controls one or 2 it would be fine!

[Roberto]

I would say yes, but only a small amount of turfs. This will make it harder to searh the turftakerovers, so they are forced to be patient and look. It will causes some roleplay too about the rules who owns which turf and stuff. I would say +1

[Whiskey]

[ Up's ] Voted for Yes, bring them back. (Approx. 50 turfs) because i was not around when 'Turfs' was in the server so it would be a new feature for me.

[ Down's ] Lot less places for players to explore because they will be owned by factions.

[Ehruhgahn]

I vote for 10, To many turfs mean to many shootouts, i think large turfs so its better to actually RP the turfs.
Lots of turfs = Lots of DM
small amount of turfs = Less DM, More RP, and looks better.

[Soluxion]

I voted, bring them back, because it brings more action/active on IM and than 50 turfs, because it would be cool if you can own a little street and IM is light roleplay, and many people like to shoot, turfs are just to show who is the strongest gang.
So, I thought if you do more little than they have to show that they are the best, not hide like pussies till the time is left.

[Percy]

In my opinion, adding turfs will give the server abit more RP and action again.

[Rick_Soprazzo]

i love you woot,marryme

[Deck]

I voted bring them back but only 10 or so of them. I think they should be back because ATM we have all the features of an RP server but the RP itself is RPG. So might as well just have RPGish elements both ways.

[Johny Mills]

I voted for "Yes, bring them back, but only a few big ones. (Approx. 10 turfs)" it was always a nice feature. I don't understand why it got removed, the problem wasn't really the turfs, but the way people interacted with it. Ten turfs is just fine, theres absolutly no need to increase it to 50 as it would only lead in mass shoot outs. I think 10 is a nice start to see how it goes.

[Andrëa]

And also make turfs catchable by gangs!
Faction leaders whined about that the gangs didn't show respect and fear towards mafias, so that will make the gangs fear the mafias.
When a gang /turfatakeover's a turf(around 9 or 10 gang members must be to /turftakevoer) the factions would come and own them.

[francesc0]

I voted, bring them back, because it brings more action/active on IM and than 50 turfs, because it would be cool if you can own a little street and IM is light roleplay, and many people like to shoot, turfs are just to show who is the strongest gang.
So, I thought if you do more little than they have to show that they are the best, not hide like pussies till the time is left.

[Eddie]

Yes, bring them back, but only a few big ones, as others stated too many turfs mean too many shootouts

[Rick_Soprazzo]

I voted, bring them back, because it brings more action/active on IM and than 50 turfs, because it would be cool if you can own a little street and IM is light roleplay, and many people like to shoot, turfs are just to show who is the strongest gang.
So, I thought if you do more little than they have to show that they are the best, not hide like pussies till the time is left.

[Spinno]

No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...

[Vincentino]

I want this back. I know it's an reason to DM but not everyday turfs are taken by factions seriously. Also some factions just dont have enought members to take turfs. I voted for more i think it would add more fun than Just Robbing (Factions dont RP at all).

[T-Bag]

FUCKING YES, WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO

[Rafael]

Yes please,i can't wait for them

[Macedon]

YES THATS WHAT WE WAITED FOR!
I knew this wont end up just like that > viewtopic.php?f=58&t=3363!

[Nothis]

i vote for yes ( 50 turfs ) since i never get a chance to know this feature is really is and i suggest we have this for group / team ( maybe ? ) and turfs system to change turfs colour because group and team ain't real faction

[Andrëa]

No unless it's altered to not be total MG/TDM like it was.
Though, if they'll be back then max a few ones which could possibly be fought over for a reason, not only by hiding in a bush for 4 minutes every hour when the cooldown is over...

woot said don't complain about if it would be DM or TDM, he said only vote, and coment pro or contra.
I want to kill people, that's the reason I keep playing IM, if it would be ROUGH RP, like a COMUNIST state, and you can't kill people, but only admins can(like in the comunism), it would be no more fun.

Note: You people don't understand the definiton of DM. DM-DeathMatch, is when you kill/attemt to kill someone with no valid RP reason. Killing because of turf would not be DM, because if someone attempts to take over your turf, it is a big valid RP reason.
SO STOP CALLING KILLNG DM, and learn the definiton of DM and RP!!!!

[Alonso Kane]

Turfs is the best

[Paz]

Yes bring them back , but not to many

[Benjamin]

10 big turfs please, would be a lot cooler.

[Macedon]

10 turfs would be bad to defence IMO

[T-Bag]

50 FUCKING TURFS, NOT 10 -.-.1312.3-=1 .FAM OSFJIAOFN ASFJIQ ICFQ .

[Mark]

Hell yeah, 50 TURFSSSSSSSS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Bossnigguh]

Yes, around 20 would be cool.

[JustinallicA]

Yes, bring them back. (Approx. 50 turfs)