that's not the point....Gregory wrote:You can also be kicked for an OOC reason.
In deed, and this should only back up if you got a tape recorder tucked in to your pocket, but Legal factions have too much piss up their heads to take this in to action.Sly_Spartan wrote:SSes are inteded for pure OOC reasons and imo it's pure MGing if its used in IC matters.
'Cameras' are there for a reason.
-- Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:05 pm --
There is no such camera flying 2 ft. behind your back which will record things without anyone knowing In Real life.
Screenshots may be counted valid if RPed as Discreet camera in the room or in clothes but only if it has been installed RPly before the situation. (i'm not sure about this one , some one authorized should confirm it all)
m3d?Alex wrote:In deed, and this should only back up if you got a tape recorder tucked in to your pocket, but Legal factions have too much piss up their heads to take this in to action.Sly_Spartan wrote:SSes are inteded for pure OOC reasons and imo it's pure MGing if its used in IC matters.
'Cameras' are there for a reason.
-- Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:05 pm --
There is no such camera flying 2 ft. behind your back which will record things without anyone knowing In Real life.
Screenshots may be counted valid if RPed as Discreet camera in the room or in clothes but only if it has been installed RPly before the situation. (i'm not sure about this one , some one authorized should confirm it all)
My signature ((sorry for stealing it Ozzy))Sean_Heatley wrote:m3d?Alex wrote:In deed, and this should only back up if you got a tape recorder tucked in to your pocket, but Legal factions have too much piss up their heads to take this in to action.Sly_Spartan wrote:SSes are inteded for pure OOC reasons and imo it's pure MGing if its used in IC matters.
'Cameras' are there for a reason.
-- Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:05 pm --
There is no such camera flying 2 ft. behind your back which will record things without anyone knowing In Real life.
Screenshots may be counted valid if RPed as Discreet camera in the room or in clothes but only if it has been installed RPly before the situation. (i'm not sure about this one , some one authorized should confirm it all)
Trouble is not with FBI, They are just pro's and doing it right.Carrone wrote:Agreed, using screenshots and posting them as IC pictures is mixing in my opinion. FBI could just go around, making screenshots instead of using a camera and get ''proof'' without the illegal factions having a chance of defending themselves, such as shooting the agent or taking his camera because he isn't actually holding one.
frankvg wrote:Or something like i'm RPing - My company and me are sometimes using shades with a secret-camera in it, to make IC Screenshots.
Well i think you can only use F8 IC in a scenario for example as said above.
Like I said ''FBI ->COULD<-'' I'm not saying that they are, I'm just saying how powergaming it is to do such a thing, as there's no reason for the person to respond to his actions, as it's invisible to the other player that he's taking screenshots. Anyone accepting screenshots as pictures without it being roleplayed should be punished for powergaming aswell. Sadly, this doesn't happen.Sly_Spartan wrote:Trouble is not with FBI, They are just pro's and doing it right.Carrone wrote:Agreed, using screenshots and posting them as IC pictures is mixing in my opinion. FBI could just go around, making screenshots instead of using a camera and get ''proof'' without the illegal factions having a chance of defending themselves, such as shooting the agent or taking his camera because he isn't actually holding one.
Trouble is snitches going to Law with SSes and some civilians posting SSes in an IC complaint of an LEO.
I think there should be rule like if you are going to put SS as proof you need to provide a SS as OOC proof of you actually RPing installation of a hidden camera.
Tony_Tagliano wrote: its pretty easy.
SS = OOC
Recording = SS is necessary for a valid proof of the actual converstation.
Camera = IC.
So is what I said but I would appreciate if there is a rule against it.Tony_Tagliano wrote:OOC is ooc and IC is IC.
SS IS OOC and Camera is IC.
Using SS'es for evidence for reporting a mafia or soemthing to the police or something is not valid evidence as its mixing.
when it comes to Rping recording a converstation, ss must be the only way as you need proof of the actual converstation otherwise it could sound like your powergaming.
so..
its pretty easy.
SS = OOC
Recording = SS is necessary for a valid proof of the actual converstation.
Camera = IC.
It is, metagaming. If someone sends pd or anyone else a as which he uses as picture, proof and the other guy uses it as a real picture, then you have metagaming from both sides. So, the rule is there already. Just not not with clear text. Could edit the description with that as example aswell tho.Sly_Spartan wrote:So is what I said but I would appreciate if there is a rule against it.Tony_Tagliano wrote:OOC is ooc and IC is IC.
SS IS OOC and Camera is IC.
Using SS'es for evidence for reporting a mafia or soemthing to the police or something is not valid evidence as its mixing.
when it comes to Rping recording a converstation, ss must be the only way as you need proof of the actual converstation otherwise it could sound like your powergaming.
so..
its pretty easy.
SS = OOC
Recording = SS is necessary for a valid proof of the actual converstation.
Camera = IC.
About that mix ,haha here's a joke , sonny texas Buhahahahahhaha,Tony_Tagliano wrote:It is, metagaming. If someone sends pd or anyone else a as which he uses as picture, proof and the other guy uses it as a real picture, then you have metagaming from both sides. So, the rule is there already. Just not not with clear text. Could edit the description with that as example aswell tho.Sly_Spartan wrote:So is what I said but I would appreciate if there is a rule against it.Tony_Tagliano wrote:OOC is ooc and IC is IC.
SS IS OOC and Camera is IC.
Using SS'es for evidence for reporting a mafia or soemthing to the police or something is not valid evidence as its mixing.
when it comes to Rping recording a converstation, ss must be the only way as you need proof of the actual converstation otherwise it could sound like your powergaming.
so..
its pretty easy.
SS = OOC
Recording = SS is necessary for a valid proof of the actual converstation.
Camera = IC.
Not just that but there should be stricter against it since 'F-leaders' are supposed 'NOT' to rulebreak. And every member who gets FKed for IC reason and suspects MG in it he should have right to forum report and ask for the evidence.Tony_Tagliano wrote:It is, metagaming. If someone sends pd or anyone else a as which he uses as picture, proof and the other guy uses it as a real picture, then you have metagaming from both sides. So, the rule is there already. Just not not with clear text. Could edit the description with that as example aswell tho.Sly_Spartan wrote:So is what I said but I would appreciate if there is a rule against it.Tony_Tagliano wrote:OOC is ooc and IC is IC.
SS IS OOC and Camera is IC.
Using SS'es for evidence for reporting a mafia or soemthing to the police or something is not valid evidence as its mixing.
when it comes to Rping recording a converstation, ss must be the only way as you need proof of the actual converstation otherwise it could sound like your powergaming.
so..
its pretty easy.
SS = OOC
Recording = SS is necessary for a valid proof of the actual converstation.
Camera = IC.