Ehruhgahn wrote:Well done woot.
Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
If you had any idea of how long it takes to look up every single reported player's admin history, to decide when he deserves a temp. suspension, a ban or a permanent ban, I'm pretty sure you'd think otherwise. I've tried doing that but it takes way too long, and reports are already a pain in the ass to deal with.Ehruhgahn wrote:Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Wouldn't we all, I think if they still continue to rule break after being jailed a few times it should be a Temp Ban, If they continue after that a IP Ban.
I wouldn't expect you to go back and read all bans and stuff on the account you get what 10-11 Records on the UCP just check them? but yeah reports already seem like a bother ^.^MacKenzie wrote:If you had any idea of how long it takes to look up every single reported player's admin history, to decide when he deserves a temp. suspension, a ban or a permanent ban, I'm pretty sure you'd think otherwise. I've tried doing that but it takes way too long, and reports are already a pain in the ass to deal with.Ehruhgahn wrote:Kjetil wrote:I'd rather see them banned.Sean_Heatley wrote:Prevention is the most effective tool. If people know they might risk 4 hours in jail they'll think twiceFabio wrote:If you meant double the two hours that would be too much pal. Really.
Wouldn't we all, I think if they still continue to rule break after being jailed a few times it should be a Temp Ban, If they continue after that a IP Ban.
Makke wrote:[ AJAIL ] Jake_Hawk[57] has been adminjailed by Makke_Benton for 120 minutes. Reason: DMing inside the PD [Forum report]
Killing inside the PD without a valid reason;usama_ilyas wrote:Why are admins still jailing for 120mins for deathmathing? 0.0Makke wrote:[ AJAIL ] Jake_Hawk[57] has been adminjailed by Makke_Benton for 120 minutes. Reason: DMing inside the PD [Forum report]
lolsantones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
hmm.. /me facepalmsThe Great Old wrote:lolsantones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think he was trolling but none of you lot get it.The Great Old wrote:santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think you don't really know the right meaning of DM.
I suggest you to read the server rules clearly.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16
I wouldn't be sure of that with the current players on IM...Fabio wrote:I think he was trolling but none of you lot get it.The Great Old wrote:santones wrote:excuseme still be DM if you use /me takes out their gun using RP?
I think you don't really know the right meaning of DM.
I suggest you to read the server rules clearly.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16